<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCIS</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Clinical and Investigative Surgery</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">J. Clin. Invest. Surg.</abbrev-journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">J Clin Invest Surg</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2559-5555</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>ProScholar Media</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25083/2559.5555/7.2.8</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">jcis-7-2-00008</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Original Research Paper</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Comparison of patient outcomes with and without graft following modified high tibial osteotomy</article-title>
        <alt-title alt-title-type="running-head">High tibial osteotomy and grafting</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Tasatan</surname>
            <given-names>Ersin</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref rid="af1-jcis-7-2-00008" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
          <xref rid="c1-jcis-7-2-00008" ref-type="corresp">*</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Tekın</surname>
            <given-names>Esra</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref rid="af2-jcis-7-2-00008" ref-type="aff">2</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="af1-jcis-7-2-00008"><label>1</label>PROF. DR. CEMIL TASCIOGLU CITY HOSPITAL, DEPARTMENT OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, SISLI, ISTANBUL, TURKEY</aff>
      <aff id="af2-jcis-7-2-00008"><label>2</label>PROF. DR. CEMIL TASCIOGLU CITY HOSPITAL, DEPARTMENT OF ANESTHESIA AND REANIMATION, SISLI, ISTANBUL, TURKEY</aff>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp id="c1-jcis-7-2-00008"><label>*</label>Correspondence: Ersin Tasatan; <email>drersintasatan@yahoo.com</email></corresp>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>20</day>
        <month>11</month>
        <year>2022</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>11</month>
        <year>2022</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>7</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <elocation-id>8</elocation-id>
      <fpage>164</fpage>
      <lpage>168</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>24</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2022</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>16</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2022</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2022 by the authors.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license</ext-link>.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://www.e-repository.org/jcis/7/2/8.pdf">Full Text PDF</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>Objectives. The aim of this study is to evaluate the early results of patients with and without grafting with the proximal tibia medial biplanar open wedge osteotomy technique used in the surgical treatment of varus gonarthrosis and to compare them with the literature. Materials and Methods. Thirty-six patients with medial gonarthrosis with varus alignment were included in the study. The proximal tibia medial biplanar open wedge osteotomy was performed on thirty-six knees. In eighteen of these patients, a tricortical graft was applied to the osteotomy site from the iliac wing being noted as Group 1. The other patients who did not receive grafts constituted Group 2. All patients were evaluated according to the Ahlbäck classification. Leg length radiographs were taken for all patients, and the osteotomy angle was calculated according to Paley's measurements. Results. Although the mean union-time at the osteotomy site was shorter in the Group 1, it was not statistically significant. No significant difference was observed in terms of HSS scores, and no reduction loss was observed in any patient. The hematoma was seen in three patients in Group 2 and one patient in Group 1. The donor site problems were observed in 10 patients in Group 1. Conclusions. With proximal tibia medial biplanar osteotomy, frontal plane and sagittal plane deformities can be corrected in patients with varus gonarthrosis, and good clinical results can be obtained without using grafts, thus avoiding donor site complications.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>grafting</kwd>
        <kwd>modified</kwd>
        <kwd>high</kwd>
        <kwd>tibia</kwd>
        <kwd>osteotomy</kwd>
        <kwd>comparison</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <counts>
        <fig-count count="4"/>
        <table-count count="2"/>
        <ref-count count="23"/>
      </counts>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1-jcis-7-2-00008" sec-type="intro">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Osteotomy is known as knee joint sparing surgery to treat frontal and/or sagittal plane deformities, with or without instability. The main purpose of this method is to correct frontal and/or sagittal plane deformities, to protect the articular cartilage by changing the load distribution and to optimize the coronal and anteroposterior stabilization of the knee [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1-jcis-7-2-00008">1</xref>]. High tibial osteotomy is considered an ideal option for the treatment of symptomatic varus knees as a result of metaphyseal deformities caused by structural or traumatic causes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2-jcis-7-2-00008">2</xref>].</p>
      <p>Although the indications and contraindications of the high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in varus knees have not been determined with definite limits, a patient can be defined as a candidate for HTO. According to the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopedic Sports Medicine (ISAKOS), a candidate for HTO can be defined as follows: there is localized pain in the medial knee joint and a narrowing in the medial joint space associated with medial arthrosis and varus on direct X-ray taken by pressing, with normal lateral and patellofemoral compartments, Body Mass Index (BMI) below 30 kg/m2, 40–60 years old patient with high expectation of activity (except for running and jumping) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3-jcis-7-2-00008">3</xref>].</p>
      <p>The bone union problems in the osteotomy area and related varus correction problems are the most common complications in the HTO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4-jcis-7-2-00008">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5-jcis-7-2-00008">5</xref>]. The risk of nonunion has been reported to be 4.4–19% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6-jcis-7-2-00008">6</xref>]. The use of bone grafts has traditionally been recommended to prevent nonunion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7-jcis-7-2-00008">7</xref>]. Autograft (iliac wing), allograft and some bone-like materials can be preferred as grafts in high tibial osteotomy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8-jcis-7-2-00008">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9-jcis-7-2-00008">9</xref>]. Although obtaining autografts from the iliac wing has some complications such as pain, thigh hypoesthesia, and infection, its effect on bone union is clearly stronger than other methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4-jcis-7-2-00008">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10-jcis-7-2-00008">10</xref>]. Bone healing is a complex process and depends on ideal biological and mechanical environments. Stability has an important role in the bone union process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11-jcis-7-2-00008">11</xref>].</p>
      <p>In our study, we evaluated the clinical outcomes between the group with and without graft by performing biplane osteotomy.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2-jcis-7-2-00008" sec-type="methods">
      <title>Materials and Methods</title>
      <p>The local Ethics Committee approved the study protocol (458/2022) and the study was carried out according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (2013). Written informed consent was obtained from the patients. Thirty-six patients with medial gonarthrosis with varus alignment were included in the study between March 2013 and January 2019.</p>
      <p>The proximal tibia medial biplanar open wedge osteotomy was performed on thirty-six knees. In eighteen of these patients, a tricortical graft was applied to the osteotomy site from the iliac wing and was noted as Group 1. Other patients to whom we did not apply grafts constituted Group 2. Fifteen of the patients were female and three of them were male in Group 1, the mean age was 49 years (39– 60 years) and the mean BMI was 27.32 kg/m² (20.3 – 30 kg/m²).</p>
      <p>Sixteen of the patients were female and two of them were male in Group 2, the mean age was 47 years (40– 60 years) and the mean BMI was 25.70 kg/m² (18.2 – 29 kg/m²). Tomofix plate with 12.5 mm wedge was applied with biplanar osteotomy in all patients. Patients with limited range of motion in the knee, over 60 years of age, over 30 kg/m BMI and with inflammatory disease were excluded from the study. All patients were evaluated according to the Ahlbäck classification [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12-jcis-7-2-00008">12</xref>]. Leg length radiographs were taken for all patients, and the osteotomy angle was calculated according to Paley's measurements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13-jcis-7-2-00008">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14-jcis-7-2-00008">14</xref>].</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3-jcis-7-2-00008" sec-type="methods">
      <title>Surgical Technique</title>
      <p>The patients were placed in the supine position with a tourniquet under combined epidural spinal anesthesia. The ipsilateral iliac wing was prepared for autograft. An approximately 8 cm longitudinal anteromedian skin incision was made, extending just below the tuberositas tibia with the lower pole of the patella. The tibial periosteum and pes anserinus were removed proximally and medially.</p>
      <p>Under the scopy control, the first Kirschner wire was sent from the medial of the tibia proximal metaphysis, approximately 2 cm below the joint line, towards the lateral cortex, 1 - 1.5 cm distal to the joint, and approximately 1 cm medial to the lateral cortex. K wires were applied in such a way that the tibial tubercle remained in the proximal fragment and the osteotomy was biplanar. The anterior wire was left in the anterior 1/3 of the tibial metaphysis. The incision in front of the tubercle was made so that the beak was at least 1.5 cm. The angle between the horizontal and vertical osteotomies was approximately 100°-110°. The line (vertical line) behind the tubercle to be osteotomy was drilled with K wires close to each other, coming out of the opposite cortex. Using the drill holes formed in the horizontal line, the osteotome was sent towards the lateral cortex. A thin osteotome was used on the vertical osteotomy line. The posterior cortex of the tibia was cut with a specially designed osteotome protecting the posterior neurovascular structures. The horizontal line of osteotomy was opened either with the triple osteotome technique or with the help of a specially designed distractor. The correction was made in the planned amount. Autograft was used in 14 cases. Fixation was achieved with specially designed 12.5 tomofix wedge plates (Figures 1-4).</p>
      <p>An angle-adjustable knee brace was applied to all patients. CPM (continuous passive motion) was applied from the 1st postoperative day. All patients were able to perform 30-60° knee flexion before discharge. Partial weight bearing is allowed after two weeks, and full weight bearing is allowed after four weeks. The results were evaluated clinically and radiologically. We planned the same protocols during follow-up visits. Radiological evaluation was performed with anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. 3D and conventional computed tomography were additionally planned in the early postoperative first follow-up. In the final control, evaluation with orthoroentgenography was added to the study protocol. Clinically, pain and functions were evaluated with the HSS score at the last follow-up.</p>
      <p>Statistical analysis SPSS for Windows version 15.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill., USA) was used for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics of data mean, standard deviation, median minimum, maximum, frequency and ratio values were used to describe the study population. Kolmogorov- Smirnov test was used for the distribution of variables. The χ2 test was used to compare qualitative variables. p &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4-jcis-7-2-00008" sec-type="results">
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>The mean follow-up time was 23.6 months (12-31 months) in Group 1 and 22 months (14-30 months) in Group 2. Although the mean union-time at the osteotomy site was shorter in Group 1, it was not statistically significant. No significant difference was observed in terms of HSS scores obtained in clinical evaluations at the last follow-up in both groups (Table 1).</p>
      <p>No reduction loss was observed in any patient. The lateral cortex fracture was observed in a total of five patients, three from the 1st Group and two from the second Group. The hematoma was seen in three patients in Group 2 and one patient in Group 1. The donor site problems were observed in 10 patients in Group 1. Significant pain was observed in the early postoperative period in 9 of them, and hypoesthesia in addition to pain was observed in one patient (Table 2).</p>
      <p>Ersin Tasatan &amp; Esra Akdas Tekın Group 1 Group 2 P value n 18 18 Age (years) 49 (39 – 60) 47 (40– 60 ) 0.782 BMI (kg/m²) 27.32 (20.3 – 30)</p>
      <p>25.70 (18.2 – 29) 0.203 Male 3 (16%) 2 (11%) 0.500 Female 15 (84%) 16 (89%) 0.500 Tabocco use 4 (22%) 6 (33%) 0.074 Albaech 0 2 (11%) 1 (%5) Albaech 1 1 (%5) 3 (%16) Albaech 2 8 (%44) 7 (%39) Albaech 3 7 (%39) 7 (%39) Follow–up (months) 23.6 (12-31) 22 (14-30) 0.60 Union time (months) 13.3 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12-jcis-7-2-00008">12</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13-jcis-7-2-00008">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14-jcis-7-2-00008">14</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15-jcis-7-2-00008">15</xref>] 13.8 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11-jcis-7-2-00008">11</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12-jcis-7-2-00008">12</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13-jcis-7-2-00008">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14-jcis-7-2-00008">14</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15-jcis-7-2-00008">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16-jcis-7-2-00008">16</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17-jcis-7-2-00008">17</xref>] 0.69 HSS score Excellent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17-jcis-7-2-00008">17</xref>]</p>
      <p>Good[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1-jcis-7-2-00008">1</xref>]</p>
      <p>Excellent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16-jcis-7-2-00008">16</xref>]</p>
      <p>Good[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2-jcis-7-2-00008">2</xref>] 0.73 Group 1 Group 2 P value Loss of reduction None None Nonunion None None Lateral Cortex fracture 3 (%16) 2 (%11) Hematoma 1 (%5) 3 (%16) Donor site problems 10 (%55) None</p>
      <table-wrap id="T1-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>Table 1</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Patient demographics and follow-up data (Group 1: grafted; Group 2: non-grafted)</p>
        </caption>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="T2-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>Table 2</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Complications</p>
        </caption>
      </table-wrap>
      <fig id="F1-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>Figure 1</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Preop. X-ray (patient with graft)</p>
        </caption>
      </fig>
      <fig id="F2-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>Figure 2</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Postop. X-ray (patient with graft)</p>
        </caption>
      </fig>
      <fig id="F3-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>Figure 3</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Preop. X-ray (patient without graft)</p>
        </caption>
      </fig>
      <fig id="F4-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>Figure 4</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Postop. X-ray (patient without graft)</p>
        </caption>
      </fig>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5-jcis-7-2-00008" sec-type="discussion">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>Biplanar high tibial osteotomy is a good treatment option for young, active knee patients. Appropriate patient selection and careful surgical technique are the most important factors affecting long-term outcomes. It is preferable to apply the HTO procedure without applying an autologous bone graft to the osteotomy site. Not using bone grafts helps to reduce patient morbidity and surgical time. The use of bone grafts has recently been recommended for special cases and large angular deformities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4-jcis-7-2-00008">4</xref>]. The consolidation of HTO without bone grafting is done using modern locking plates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15-jcis-7-2-00008">15</xref>], but the first randomized clinical trial was performed with conventional HTO Puddu stainless steel plates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16-jcis-7-2-00008">16</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17-jcis-7-2-00008">17</xref>]. Puddu may or may not be sufficient to maintain plate stability; to maintain stability, the lateral tibial cortex must be left intact to act as a hinge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18-jcis-7-2-00008">18</xref>]. In the literature, it was found a 58% decrease in axial stability and a 68% decrease in torsional stability when the lateral tibial cortex was fractured [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19-jcis-7-2-00008">19</xref>]. In our series, lateral tibial fractured cortex occurred in five patients in both groups. In these patients, axial loading started 2 weeks later and the union was achieved. In our study, bone union was observed earlier in the group with autologous bone graft compared to the group without graft, but the difference was not statistically significant.</p>
      <p>Complications in this study were similar to those described in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4-jcis-7-2-00008">4</xref>]. A high incidence of hematoma has been associated with not using drains in the post-surgical period [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4-jcis-7-2-00008">4</xref>]. In our study, we evaluated that the routine use of drains after the osteotomy is beneficial. Although not statistically significant in our study, hematoma formation was observed more frequently in the group that did not use bone grafts.</p>
      <p>In a study of 92 patients who applied for the Tomofiks plate in the literature, they did not use grafts. Loss of correction degree was observed in 3 patients. It has been reported that this complication occurs after implant removal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20-jcis-7-2-00008">20</xref>]. We used tomofix in our study, we did not remove the implant. No correction loss was observed. Puddu stated that there is no need for grafting if the amount of wedge to be opened is less than 7.5 mm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21-jcis-7-2-00008">21</xref>]. In a study in which 18 patients used porous hydroxyapatite grafts following proximal tibial osteotomy to 23 knees, nonunion and recurrence were not observed in any of the patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4-jcis-7-2-00008">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22-jcis-7-2-00008">22</xref>]. Consistent with the literature, we did not observe recurrence in either group in our study. We evaluate that the type of osteotomy affects this in patients who do not use grafts.</p>
      <p>Esenkaya et al. reported that they saw nonunion in one of their patients and attributed this to the use of allograft in their study in which they published the results of HTO applied to 58 patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23-jcis-7-2-00008">23</xref>]. In our study, nonunion was not observed in both groups.</p>
      <p>Our study has some limitations. The number of our patients is not high, short-term follow-up and inability to be compared with other angled tomofix plates can be counted.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec6-jcis-7-2-00008" sec-type="conclusions">
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>In the surgical treatment of suitable patients with varus gonarthrosis, proximal tibial osteotomies may be considered instead of prosthetic options first. These osteotomies can be performed in various ways, with various grafts and various implants. With proximal tibia medial biplanar osteotomy, frontal plane and sagittal plane deformities can be corrected in patients with varus gonarthrosis, and good clinical results can be obtained without using grafts, thus avoiding donor site complications.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <notes notes-type="conflict-of-interest">
      <title>Conflict of interest disclosure</title>
      <p>There are no known conflicts of interest in the publication of this article. The manuscript was read and approved by all authors.</p>
    </notes>
    <notes notes-type="ethics">
      <title>Compliance with ethical standards</title>
      <p>Any aspect of the work covered in this manuscript has been conducted with the ethical approval of all relevant bodies and that such approvals are acknowledged within the manuscript.</p>
    </notes>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>1</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lobenhoffer P. Indication for Unicompartmental Knee Replacement versus Osteotomy around the Knee. J Knee Surg. 2017 Oct;30(8):769-773. doi: 10.1055/s- 0037-1605558</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>2</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Rossi R, Bonasia DE, Amendola A. The role of high tibial osteotomy in the varus knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Oct;19(10):590-9. doi: 10.5435/00124635- 201110000-00003</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>3</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Neyret P, Valley P, Buckwalter J, Jakob R, Ochi M. Symposium: Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty. In: ISAKOS Congress, 2005; Hollywood, Florida, USA. https://www.isakos.com/assets/meetings/2005congress /FINAL%20version%20of%20FINAL%20PROGRA M%2003.11.2005.pdf</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>4</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lee DC, Byun SJ. High tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2012 Jun;24(2):61-9. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.2012.24.2.61</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>5</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Slevin O, Ayeni OR, Hinterwimmer S, Tischer T, Feucht MJ, Hirschmann MT. The role of bone void fillers in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016;24:3584–3598. doi: 10.1007/s00167- 016-4297-5</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>6</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Spahn G. Complications in high tibial (medial opening wedge) osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004 Dec;124(10):649-53. doi: 10.1007/s00402-003-0588-7</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>7</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Insall JN, Joseph DM, Msika C. High tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984 Sep;66(7):1040-8.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>8</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Rossi R, Bonasia DE, Amendola A. The role of high tibial osteotomy in the varus knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Oct;19(10):590-9. doi: 10.5435/00124635- 201110000-00003</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>9</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Savarese E, Bisicchia S, Romeo R, Amendola A. Role of high tibial osteotomy in chronic injuries of posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner. J Orthop Traumatol. 2011 Mar;12(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s10195- 010-0120-0</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>10</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Naudie D, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Bourne TJ. The Install Award. Survivorship of the high tibial valgus osteotomy. A 10- to -22-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Oct;(367):18-27.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>11</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Rudan JF, Simurda MA. High tibial osteotomy. A prospective clinical and roentgenographic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Jun;(255):251-6</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>12</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pedersen MM, Geoffroy Mongelard KB, Mørup- Petersen A, Bang Christensen K, Odgaard A. Clinicians' heuristic assessments of radiographs compared with Kellgren-Lawrence and Ahlbäck ordinal grading: an exploratory study of knee radiographs using paired comparisons. BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 8;11(3):e041793. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041793</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>13</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Paley D. Realignment for mono-compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. In: Paley D, editor. Principles of deformity col-lection. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2002. pp. 479-507. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-59373-4_16</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>14</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Paley D, Maar DC, Herzenberg JE. New concepts in high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994 Jul;25(3):483-98.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>15</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Amendola A, Bonasia DE. Results of high tibial osteotomy: review of the literature. Int Orthop. 2010 Feb;34(2):155-60. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0889-8</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>16</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Phillips CL, Silver DA, Schranz PJ, Mandalia V. The measurement of patellar height: a review of the methods of imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Aug; 92(8):1045-53. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B8.23794</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>17</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Belsey J, Diffo Kaze A, Jobson S, Faulkner J, Maas S, Khakha R, Pape D, Wilson AJ. The biomechanical effects of allograft wedges used for large corrections during medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. PLoS One. 2019 May 10;14(5):e0216660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216660</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>18</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">MacIntosh DL, Welsh RP. Joint débridement--a complement to high tibial osteotomy in the treatment of degenerative arthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977 Dec;59(8):1094-7.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>19</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hohmann E, Bryant A, Imhoff AB. The effect of closed wedge high tibial osteotomy on tibial slope: a radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 May;14(5):454-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167- 005-0700-3</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>20</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Song EK, Seon JK, Park SJ, Jeong MS. The complications of high tibial osteotomy: closing- versus opening-wedge Ersin Tasatan &amp; Esra Akdas Tekın methods. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Sep;92(9):1245-52. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B9.23660</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>21</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Nelissen EM, van Langelaan EJ, Nelissen RG. Stability of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a failure analysis. Int Orthop. 2010 Feb;34(2):217-23.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>22</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wright JM, Crockett HC, Slawski DP, Madsen MW, Windsor RE. High tibial osteotomy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005 Jul;13(4):279-89. doi: 10.5435/00124635- 200507000-00007</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23-jcis-7-2-00008">
        <label>23</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Esenkaya I. Proksimal tibia medial açik kama osteotomisinde kamali plak uygulamasi [Fixation of proximal tibia medial opening wedge osteotomy using plates with wedges]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2005;39(3):211-23.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
